Bringing car spotting into perspective

Rear

Swap

Spec height¹ 68 in 2
+ 2.24 in

1 65.7 in Spec height¹

+ 3.9 in 2 72.8 in Spec width²

1 68.9 in Spec width²

Now Comparing Photos show real-world appearance vs. specification. See Disclaimer.

Mitsubishi

Outlander

SUV

Gen. 1 | 2003 - 2006

Spotted in Poland 17″ MR Quality

Chevrolet

Captiva

SUV

2006 - 2018

Spotted in Switzerland 18″

Compare Car Insurance Rates Personalized quotes in 5 minutes or less with Insurify

Rear View Car Size ComparisonMitsubishi Outlander (CU0W) SUV 2003 vs. Chevrolet Captiva (C100) SUV 2006

Dimensions & Specifications | Mitsubishi Outlander (CU0W) SUV 2003 is 3.9 in narrower and 2.24 in lower compared to Chevrolet Captiva (C100) SUV 2006. It offers 34% less cargo space.^4,5

Compact

Size class

Compact

178.9 in

Length

184 in

+5.1

68.9 in

Width²

72.8 in

+3.9

-- in

Width incl. mirrors

-- in

65.7 in

Height¹

68 in

+2.3

103.3 in

Wheelbase

106.6 in

+3.3

-- in

Ground clearance³

-- in

3340 lbs

Weight^4,⁶

-- lbs

Seats max.

14.2 cu ft

Cargo volume EU⁴

16.8 cu ft

+19%

37 cu ft

Cargo volume max. EU^4,⁵

55.7 cu ft

+51%

-- cu ft

Cargo volume US⁴

-- cu ft

Cargo volume max. US^4,⁵

-- cu ft

Standard

Segment

Standard

€ 21990

Price EU⁷

€ --

$ --

Price US⁷

$ --

inch

Similar Vehicles

Honda

CR-V 97.9%

2004 - 2006

Nissan

X-Trail 97.6%

2000 - 2007

Subaru

Forester 97.4%

RAV4 97.4%

Santa Fe 97.1%

2000 - 2004

Nissan

Qashqai 96.4%

2006 - 2010

Chevrolet

Captiva 96.0%

Vue 96.0%

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Quick Facts

3199185
Comparison combinations

Germany
Origin of the most car models

1908
Year of our oldest car model

Featured in

Compare car dimensions with real cars side-by-side, true-to-scale, and from the same point of view for thousands of current and historical models. Limitations apply - please read our disclaimer.

Let us know about the cars you'd love to see on our website by contacting us on social media or dropping us an email to info[at]carsized[dot]com.

English

English US

Donate

Rear View Car Size ComparisonMitsubishi Outlander (CU0W) SUV 2003 vs. Chevrolet Captiva (C100) SUV 2006

Dimensions & Specifications | Mitsubishi Outlander (CU0W) SUV 2003 is 3.9 in narrower and 2.24 in lower compared to Chevrolet Captiva (C100) SUV 2006. It offers 34% less cargo space.4,5

Dimensions & Specifications | Mitsubishi Outlander (CU0W) SUV 2003 is 3.9 in narrower and 2.24 in lower compared to Chevrolet Captiva (C100) SUV 2006. It offers 34% less cargo space.^4,5