Bringing car spotting into perspective

Side

Rear

Real height¹ 1.835 m 2
+ 39.3 cm

1 1.442 m Real height¹

+ 111.8 cm 2 5.341 m Real length

1 4.223 m Real length

Click/tap cars to swap positions Street perspective vs. specification. See Disclaimer.

Alfa Romeo

147 937

1 3-door Hatchback 2000 - 2010 16″

Spotted in Switzerland

Rolls-Royce

Cullinan

2 SUV 2018 - present 21″

Spotted in Switzerland

Mirrored image

Side View
Alfa Romeo 147 (937) 3-door Hatchback 2000 vs. Rolls-Royce Cullinan SUV 2018

Alfa Romeo 147 (937) 3-door Hatchback 2000 is 111.8 cm shorter and 39.3 cm lower compared to Rolls-Royce Cullinan SUV 2018

254.6 cm

Wheelbase

329.5 cm

+74.9

422.3 cm

Length

534.1 cm

+111.8

172.9 cm

Width²

216.4 cm

+43.5

144.2 cm

Height¹

183.5 cm

+39.3

292 l

Cargo volume³

555 l

+91%

1042 l

Cargo volume max.^3,⁴

1930 l

+86%

1. Maximum height | 2. Width with folded mirrors | 3. Most common power unit. Possible deviation of standards. | 4. With rear seats folded down

Let us know about the cars you'd love to see on our website by contacting us on social media or dropping us an email to info[at]carsized[dot]com.

This website provides simple means to compare car dimensions and design from a street perspective side by side for many current and old models. Limitations apply - please read our disclaimer.

English

Donate

Side ViewAlfa Romeo 147 (937) 3-door Hatchback 2000 vs. Rolls-Royce Cullinan SUV 2018

Alfa Romeo 147 (937) 3-door Hatchback 2000 is 111.8 cm shorter and 39.3 cm lower compared to Rolls-Royce Cullinan SUV 2018

Side View
Alfa Romeo 147 (937) 3-door Hatchback 2000 vs. Rolls-Royce Cullinan SUV 2018