Bringing car spotting into perspective

Side

Rear

Real height¹ 1.955 m 2
+ 35.1 cm

1 1.604 m Real height¹

+ 105.4 cm 2 5.131 m Real length

1 4.077 m Real length

Click/tap cars to swap positions Street perspective vs. specification. See Disclaimer.

Ford1 | Change

B-Max 1 JK8

Minivan 2012 - 2017 16″

Spotted in Switzerland

Mirrored image

Chevrolet2 | Change

Tahoe GMT900

SUV 2005 - 2014 17″

Spotted in Switzerland

Side ViewFord B-Max (JK8) Minivan 2012 vs. Chevrolet Tahoe (GMT900) SUV 2005

Technical specs | Ford B-Max (JK8) Minivan 2012 is 105.4 cm shorter and 35.1 cm lower compared to Chevrolet Tahoe (GMT900) SUV 2005. It offers 56% less cargo space.^4,5

248.9 cm

Wheelbase

294.6 cm

+45.7

407.7 cm

Length

513.1 cm

+105.4

175.1 cm

Width²

200.7 cm

+25.6

208 cm

Width incl. mirrors

-- cm

160.4 cm

Height¹

195.5 cm

+35.1

-- cm

Ground clearance³

23.1 cm

318 l

Cargo volume⁴

1708 l

+438%

1386 l

Cargo volume max.^4,⁵

3084 l

+123%

1. Maximum height | 2. Width with folded mirrors | 3. Max. ground clearance | 4. Most common power unit. Possible deviation of standards. | 5. With rear seats folded down

inch

Quick Facts

674541
Comparison combinations

Germany
Origin of the most car models

1908
Year of our oldest car model

Let us know about the cars you'd love to see on our website by contacting us on social media or dropping us an email to info[at]carsized[dot]com.

This website provides simple means to compare car dimensions and design from a street perspective side by side for many current and old models. Limitations apply - please read our disclaimer.

English

Donate

Side ViewFord B-Max (JK8) Minivan 2012 vs. Chevrolet Tahoe (GMT900) SUV 2005

Technical specs | Ford B-Max (JK8) Minivan 2012 is 105.4 cm shorter and 35.1 cm lower compared to Chevrolet Tahoe (GMT900) SUV 2005. It offers 56% less cargo space.4,5

Technical specs | Ford B-Max (JK8) Minivan 2012 is 105.4 cm shorter and 35.1 cm lower compared to Chevrolet Tahoe (GMT900) SUV 2005. It offers 56% less cargo space.^4,5