Bringing car spotting into perspective

Side

Rear

Real height¹ 1.43 m 2

1 1.67 m Real height¹
+ 24 cm

+ 10.6 cm 2 4.661 m Real length

1 4.555 m Real length

Click/tap cars to swap positions Street perspective vs. specification. See Disclaimer.

Mazda1 | Change

CX-5 GH

SUV 2012 - 2017 17″

Spotted in Switzerland

Seat2 | Change

Exeo 1 3R

Sedan 2008 - 2011 16″

Spotted in Switzerland

Side ViewMazda CX-5 (GH) SUV 2012 vs. Seat Exeo (3R) Sedan 2008

Technical specs | Mazda CX-5 (GH) SUV 2012 is 10.6 cm shorter and 24 cm higher compared to Seat Exeo (3R) Sedan 2008. It offers 95% more cargo space.^4,5

270 cm

+5.8

Wheelbase

264.2 cm

455.5 cm

Length

466.1 cm

+10.6

184 cm

+6.8

Width²

177.2 cm

-- cm

Width incl. mirrors

-- cm

167 cm

+24

Height¹

143 cm

21 cm

Ground clearance³

-- cm

503 l

+10%

Cargo volume⁴

460 l

1620 l

+95%

Cargo volume max.^4,⁵

833 l

1. Maximum height | 2. Width with folded mirrors | 3. Max. ground clearance | 4. Most common power unit. Possible deviation of standards. | 5. With rear seats folded down

inch

Quick Facts

726615
Comparison combinations

Germany
Origin of the most car models

1908
Year of our oldest car model

Let us know about the cars you'd love to see on our website by contacting us on social media or dropping us an email to info[at]carsized[dot]com.

This website provides simple means to compare car dimensions and design from a street perspective side by side for many current and old models. Limitations apply - please read our disclaimer.

English

Donate

Side ViewMazda CX-5 (GH) SUV 2012 vs. Seat Exeo (3R) Sedan 2008

Technical specs | Mazda CX-5 (GH) SUV 2012 is 10.6 cm shorter and 24 cm higher compared to Seat Exeo (3R) Sedan 2008. It offers 95% more cargo space.4,5

Technical specs | Mazda CX-5 (GH) SUV 2012 is 10.6 cm shorter and 24 cm higher compared to Seat Exeo (3R) Sedan 2008. It offers 95% more cargo space.^4,5