Bringing car spotting into perspective

Side

Rear

Swap

Real height¹ 1.955 m 2
+ 50.2 cm

1 1.453 m Real height¹

+ 125.6 cm 2 5.131 m Real length

1 3.875 m Real length

Street perspective vs. specification. See Disclaimer.

Mitsubishi

Colt

Cabriolet 2005 - 2010

Spotted in Switzerland

16″

Chevrolet

Tahoe 3

SUV 2005 - 2014

Spotted in Switzerland

17″

Side ViewMitsubishi Colt (Z3B) Cabriolet 2005 vs. Chevrolet Tahoe (GMT900) SUV 2005

Technical specs | Mitsubishi Colt (Z3B) Cabriolet 2005 is 125.6 cm shorter and 50.2 cm lower compared to Chevrolet Tahoe (GMT900) SUV 2005. It offers 86% less cargo space.^4,5

387.5 cm

Length

513.1 cm

+125.6

169.5 cm

Width²

200.7 cm

+31.2

-- cm

Width incl. mirrors

-- cm

145.3 cm

Height¹

195.5 cm

+50.2

250 cm

Wheelbase

294.6 cm

+44.6

-- cm

Ground clearance³

23.1 cm

460 l

Cargo volume⁴

1708 l

+272%

-- l

Cargo volume max.^4,⁵

3084 l

-- kg

Weight⁴

2388 kg

Segment

Standard

€ --

Price EU⁶

€ --

$ --

Price US⁶

$ 33980

inch

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Quick Facts

1006071
Comparison combinations

Germany
Origin of the most car models

1908
Year of our oldest car model

Let us know about the cars you'd love to see on our website by contacting us on social media or dropping us an email to info[at]carsized[dot]com.

This website provides simple means to compare car dimensions and design from a street perspective side by side for many current and old models. Limitations apply - please read our disclaimer.

English

Donate

Side ViewMitsubishi Colt (Z3B) Cabriolet 2005 vs. Chevrolet Tahoe (GMT900) SUV 2005

Technical specs | Mitsubishi Colt (Z3B) Cabriolet 2005 is 125.6 cm shorter and 50.2 cm lower compared to Chevrolet Tahoe (GMT900) SUV 2005. It offers 86% less cargo space.4,5

Technical specs | Mitsubishi Colt (Z3B) Cabriolet 2005 is 125.6 cm shorter and 50.2 cm lower compared to Chevrolet Tahoe (GMT900) SUV 2005. It offers 86% less cargo space.^4,5