Bringing car spotting into perspective

Side

Rear

Swap

Spec height¹ 64.8 in 2

1 68.5 in Spec height¹
+ 3.74 in

1 + 0.16 in

2 184.1 in Spec length

+ 2.95 in 1 187 in Spec length

Now Comparing Actual photos show real-world appearance vs. specification. See Disclaimer.

Jeep

Grand Cherokee

SUV

Gen. 3 | 2004 - 2007

Photographed in Switzerland 17″

Mazda

CX-7

SUV

Gen. 1 | 2006 - 2009

Photographed in Switzerland 17″

Compare Car Insurance Rates Personalized quotes in 5 minutes or less with Insurify

Side View Car Size ComparisonJeep Grand Cherokee (WH) SUV 2004 vs. Mazda CX-7 (ER) SUV 2006

Dimensions & Specifications | Jeep Grand Cherokee (WH) SUV 2004 is 2.95 in longer and 3.74 in higher compared to Mazda CX-7 (ER) SUV 2006. It has 0.1 in more ground clearance and offers 42% more cargo space.^4,5

Mid-size

Size class

Mid-size

187 in

+2.9

Length

184.1 in

73.6 in

Width²

73.6 in

-- in

Width incl. mirrors

-- in

68.5 in

+3.7

Height¹

64.8 in

109.4 in

+1.1

Wheelbase

108.3 in

8.2 in

+0.1

Ground clearance³

8.1 in

-- lbs

Weight^4,⁶

3902.2 lbs

Seats max.

34.5 cu ft

+115%

Cargo volume EU⁴

16.1 cu ft

67.4 cu ft

+42%

Cargo volume max. EU^4,⁵

47.6 cu ft

-- cu ft

Cargo volume US⁴

-- cu ft

Cargo volume max. US^4,⁵

-- cu ft

Standard

Segment

Standard

€ --

Price EU⁷

€ 31800

$ --

Price US⁷

$ 23690

inch

Similar Vehicles

CX-7 97.7%

Highlander 97.6%

2000 - 2004

Toyota

FJ Cruiser 97.3%

2006 - 2022

Ford

Explorer 96.7%

Durango 93.7%

2006 - 2008

Quick Facts

3219453
Comparison combinations

Germany
Origin of the most car models

1908
Year of our oldest car model

Featured in

Compare car dimensions with real cars side-by-side, true-to-scale, and from the same point of view for thousands of current and historical models. Limitations apply - please read our disclaimer.

Let us know about the cars you'd love to see on our website by contacting us on social media or dropping us an email to info[at]carsized[dot]com.